|
An IT Enabled Hierarchical Patch Dynamics Paradigm for Modeling Complex Groundwater Systems Across Multiple Scales |
|
Investigators |
Shu-Guang
Li, Qun Liu,
Guo-Wei Wei (Mathematics) |
|
Research Assistants |
Soheil Afshari, David Ni,
Yu-Hui Sun (Mathematics) |
|
Funding Agency: |
National Science
Foundation |
|
|
|
![]() |
Velocity profile along A-A a
. |
||
|
Head profile along B-B
b |
|||
| Object-Oriented
Hierarchical Patch Dynamics Paradigm (HPDP).
The interactive HPDP enables modeling a complex groundwater system across multiple scales. One
can obtain high resolution dynamics in the areas of critical interest (e.g., around
wells, contamination hotspots) by developing a hierarchy of groundwater models
of increasingly higher resolution and smaller domain. The HPDP
automatically couples dynamically the entire model hierarchies, with the parent model providing the boundary conditions for its
children which in
turn provide the boundary conditions for their own children. The HPDP
provides a ladder
between model scale, data scale, and management scale.
|
The focus of this research is to investigate a new, nature-inspired computational paradigm to analyze, characterize, and model large, complex groundwater systems and their interactions with surface water bodies. In particular, we propose to develop, test, and apply: 1) a biologically-motivated, hierarchical and patch dynamics framework for modeling 3D dynamic groundwater systems across multiple spatial and temporal scales – one that promises to eliminate or significantly alleviate key, longstanding computational bottlenecks and conceptual difficulties and 2) a new modeling paradigm that resolves a new, significant computer science problem - a barrier to the practical implementation of generalized hierarchical patch dynamics modeling. Our novel and interdisciplinary approach to modeling large-scale groundwater systems has the potential to substantially improve our ability to understand, characterize, and predict water and solute pathways and fluxes within soils, alluvial aquifers, and through geological formations and the fluxes across pertinent interfaces, to quantify the complex dynamic scale interactions and the local and regional feedback mechanisms that affect the response of aquifer systems to local and external forcing factors, and to develop model-based tools for integrated water resources planning and management, pollution control, and environmental cleanup.
Despite
the dramatic growth of computational capability over the last two decades—one
that has allowed computational science and engineering to become a unique,
powerful tool for scientific discovery—our ability to model complex, 3D
groundwater systems is still severely limited because of the following tough
computational and conceptual challenges:
1.
The
machine bottleneck.
The computational cost in large-scale groundwater modeling, analysis, and
visualization increases exponentially with the problem size and the level of
details simulated and quickly becomes prohibitive for large 3D problems.
This is especially the case for 3D multi-scale modeling, coupled processes
modeling, inverse modeling, uncertainty analysis, design optimization, iterative
hypothesis testing, and data sufficiency evaluation.
2.
The
numerical algorithmic bottleneck.
Three-dimensional modeling based on a single, large numerical representation of
a complex, heterogeneous, and multi-scale system faces an algorithmic
bottleneck. The high dimensionality, especially when combined with distorted
grids representing heterogeneity, anisotropy, multitudes of scales, complex
stratigraphy, and singular stresses, translates into highly
“ill-conditioned” systems and causes a host of tough numerical problems.
3. The scale and data assimilation problem. A fundamental problem in the analysis of complex ground-water systems is the interplay of data and modeling. Improving how data and models are used, especially across a multitude of scales, has proven to be exceedingly difficult [Hill and Tiedeman, 2002; Tiedeman et al, 2003, Vachaud et al 2002]. The following are many unresolved questions of fundamental nature and extreme practical significance facing the groundwater hydrology community:
Ø How can we maximally exploit data and information to enhance our
ability to understand the complex subsurface processes and to quantify the
fluxes across-groundwater/surface water interfaces [e.g.,
Ø How can we systematically incorporate data collected at one scale into a model representing dynamics at another disparate scale [Kolaczy and Huang, 2001; Vachaud, 2002; Hoaglund, et al., 2002]?
Ø How can we model at any scale of interest in a way that systematically accounts for the influences of regional control as well as subgrid scale processes and local scale measurements [Hoaglund, et al., 2002; Vachaud, 2002; Beckie et al., 1994; Bakker et al., 1999]?
Ø How can we address today’s pressing integrated water resources and environmental management problems that require regional solutions satisfying potentially large numbers of “scattered”, local constraints [NRC, 1993b, 1999, 2001b; Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, 2000; Rothman, 2000; Martell, 1996; Grasle, 2003; Bakker et al., 1999]?
Ø How can we model realistically and robustly complex groundwater systems across multiple spatial and temporal scales in a way that is systematic, physically based, and computationally practical [Sposito, 1998; Kirkby et al, 1996; Beckie, 1994; Sahimi, 2001]?
allow
modeling and visualizing large systems in high resolution without having to
solve large matrix systems and thus substantially alleviate the infamous
“curse of dimensionality” in 3D groundwater modeling;
allow
modeling complex, heterogeneous, and 3D dynamics incrementally (one scale at
a time) and thus obviate the need to use highly distorted grids representing
multiple scales of
variability, and substantially alleviate the stiff
matrix problem - the algorithmic bottleneck;
provide
a systematic and efficient “scaling ladder” to link data and models
across multiple spatial scales and assimilate information from disparate
sources;
provide
on the fly and dynamic integration of hierarchical computations, analyses,
and visualizations, free users from having to interact with each subscale
modeling “patches”, and eliminate the associated human bottleneck;
allow
a modeler to interactively steer
the hierarchical computation, to guide the evolution of the subsurface flow
and plume migration dynamics, to
control the visual representation of data during processing, and to
dynamically modify the computational process during its excecution. A
sophisticated navigation process
would be an invaluable tool for scientific discovery, for understanding
fundamental processes, and for practical site investigation.
Publications:
Li, S.G. and Q. Liu, "A real-time, computational steering environment for integrated groundwater modeling". Recommended for publication, under revision, Ground Water.
Li,
S.G., Q. Liu, and S. Afshari, "An
Object-Oriented
Hierarchical Patch Dynamics
Paradigm (HPDP)
S.G. Li and Q. Liu, "Interactive Ground Water (IGW)", Environmental Modeling and Software. Vol. 20, No. 12 ( In Press). Download PDF
S.G. Li, Q. Liu, Interactive Ground Water (IGW): An Innovative Digital Laboratory For Groundwater Education and Research, COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION. Vol. 11(4):179~202, 2003. Download PDF
![]()
![]() |
Shu-Guang
Li, http://www.egr.msu.edu/~lishug
Department of
Civil and Environmental Engineering |