
PROTECT WATER QUALITY WITH SLURRY-ENRICHED SEEDING OF
CEREAL COVERS ON CORN SILAGE GROUND
Printable
pdf
By: Tim Harrigan
Assistant Professor
Over the last several years many crop producers have adopted soil conservation
practices that protect water quality by preventing runoff, erosion and
sedimentation of streams and waterways. There is a need for no-till
cropping systems that stabilize soil and prevent overland flow of sediment,
nutrients and fecal pathogens yet are compatible with current manure
management practices. Such options will retain manure in the root zone
for remediation of pathogens and nutrient use in the following crop.
 |
| Figure 1. Excellent wheat
and cereal rye cover crops were obtained by combining low-disturbance
aeration tillage, seeding and slurry application in one efficient
operation. |
Cover crops have not been used widely in livestock-based cropping systems
because establishment costs, competition for labor and added management
needs have discouraged their use. Interest in the use of cover crops
is increasing because cover crops are effective barriers to overland
flow, sedimentation, and manure contamination of waterways. Ongoing
work at Michigan State University funded by the Great Lakes Basin Program
for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control has shown that excellent stands
of wheat and cereal rye can be achieved in untilled corn silage ground
by a new process that combines seeding, manure application and aeration
tillage in one efficient operation (Fig.
1). The Basin Program is coordinated
by the Great Lakes Commission in partnership with the USDA-NRCS, US-EPA,
and the Army Corps of Engineers. A specific objective of the work is
to evaluate the new process--slurry-enriched micro-site seeding--which
combines low-disturbance aeration tillage, seeding, and slurry application
in a sustainable and cost effective manner with little soil disturbance
or loss of protective crop residues.
Greater Awareness of Water Quality
The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) lists pollution
from agricultural sources as the third most common cause (1,655 river-miles)
of failure to attain water quality standards (MDEQ, 2004). Several federal
and state programs such as the Clean Michigan Initiative, Conservation
Reserve Enhancement Program, and Section 319 of the Clean Water Act
(federal funds) have been enacted to increase public awareness of water
quality issues and support education and demonstration projects. The
MDEQ has trained more than 30 volunteer organizations to assess the
quality of waters of the state. An increased interest and awareness
of water quality issues has led to an adversarial relationship among
some dairy and livestock farmers and their neighbors. The causes of
the conflicts are related to sedimentation and manure contamination
of surface waters from runoff and tile drains.
 |
| Figure 2. Soil surface after
slurry seeding. Seed-laden slurry filled the cracks and fissures
created by the aeration tines. Aeration tillage improved infiltration
and reduced overland flow. |
Barriers to Runoff and Water Contamination
Farm land is rich in nutrients. Runoff from farm fields can transport
sediment, organic solids, nutrients and pathogens to surface waters.
Low-disturbance aeration tillage serves as a barrier to runoff and water
contamination because it reduces overland flow by increasing surface
roughness, improving infiltration and conserving crop residues
(Fig. 2).
Vegetative filters, buffer strips and grass waterways have long been
used to separate cropped or manure-applied land from nearby waterways.
Cover crops are grown specifically to protect the soil from wind and
water erosion, recycle nutrients, and improve soil structure and fertility.
When manure is applied to a bare soil surface, near-surface filtration
and accumulation increase the chance of nutrient and bacterial transport
in runoff water. When manure is applied to a vegetative surface, the
near-surface zone of high biomass and organic matter enhance adsorption,
straining and filtering of bacteria and nutrients.
Manure Slurry-Enriched Seeding
Replicated plots (12 ft x 100 ft) were established in 2004 in a Capac
fine sandy loam at the University Farms at Michigan State University
in East Lansing. A commercial variety of winter wheat (Sisson) and a
common variety of cereal rye were established in late September in corn
silage stubble. The wheat was sown with a Great Plains no-till drill,
and both wheat and cereal rye were sown with a new manure slurry-enriched
seeding process. The slurry seeding was done with a slurry tanker (3000
gal) equipped with a rear-mounted rolling-tine aerator (12 ft; Aer-Way)
and SSD (sub-surface deposition) slurry distribution system. The seed
was placed in the spreader tank where bypass flow provided tank agitation
and seed mixing. The seed-laden dairy slurry was applied at 5000 gal/ac.
Specific comparisons were:
- surface manure, no tillage, no seed,
- wheat, 2 bu/ac, no-till drill, 50 lb/ac N as urea in April 2005,
- wheat, 2 bu/ac, slurry seed, 5degree gang angle,
- wheat, 2 bu/ac, slurry seed, 10 degree gang angle,
- wheat, 4 bu/ac, slurry seed, 5 degree gang angle,
- wheat, 4 bu/ac, slurry seed, 10 degree gang angle,
- cereal rye, 2 bu/ac, 5 degree gang angle, and
- cereal rye, 2 bu/ac, 10 degree gang angle.
The dairy slurry (9.5% solids, sawdust bedding) provided 125 lb/ac
total N (65 lb/ac as NH4-N; 60 lb/ac as organic N), 43 lb/ac P as P2O5,
and 140 lb/ac K as K2O. Drop tubes placed the seed-laden slurry in the
fractured and loosened soil behind each set of rolling tines. No additional
tillage or soil firming was done.
 |
| Figure 3. Wheat and rye yields
in 2005. Columns with the same a-b letters are not significantly
different (p=0.10). |
Biomass and Grain Yield
Each of the slurry-seeded treatments provided a uniform cover that suppressed
weed growth. Although our primary interest was in cover crop establishment,
we maintained the plots for grain yield measurements to see how the
slurry-seeding method would compare with conventional drilling.
Grain was harvested on July 25, 2005. Wheat yields ranged from 75 to
81 bu/ac and the rye yields ranged from 67 to 71 bu/ac. There were no
statistically significant differences between treatments (Fig.
3).
Additional work is in progress on farms throughout the Great Lakes region
to evaluate the agronomic and environmental benefits of this new cover
crop establishment method.
Conclusions
The integration of soil conservation and manure land application provided
by this new slurry-enriched seeding process provide important operational
efficiencies that encourage environmentally sensitive manure use. This
new method of soil and manure stabilization will expand the land base
available for nutrient cycling, reduce cover crop establishment costs
and protect water quality. Based on our experience in 2004-2005:
- Manure slurry-enriched seeding of wheat and cereal rye cover crops
in untilled corn silage stubble is an efficient and effective establishment
method.
- The cereal grain cover crops suppressed weed growth, and manure
use did not increase weed competition in the subsequent cover crop.
- Wheat yields with the slurry-enriched process were equal to no-till
drilling with spring fertilization (50 lb/ac N).
Additional work is in progress with MSU researchers Dale Mutch and
Sieglinde Snapp to evaluate nutrient uptake and release, impacts on
soil quality, crop protection benefits, and environmental benefits of
slurry seeding in diverse cropping systems.
References
MDEQ. 2004. Water Quality and Pollution Control in Michigan: 2004
Sections 303(d) and 305(b) Integrated Report. Michigan Department
of Environmental Quality-Water Division. Revised May, 2004. Lansing,
MI.
Archives:
Food
Engineering | Ecosystems
Engineering
Electrical
& Farm Safety | Faculty
& Student News
Sort
by Author | Past
Newsletters